Useful Links |

|
|
|
DataWrite VoyagerDrive | 
| Last week Datawrite announced their next-generation VoyagerDrive USB 2.0 flash drive. (click the image above for the full release). Well! "Flash" Drive! I had to get my hands on these namesakes to see if they lived up to my reputation. I have a couple of these to put through their paces. The Datawrite as illustrated is moulded in a semi transparent blue plastic case with brushed aluminium trimmings on the front & back. It came in a sealed moulded bubble transparent plastic case, which is normal for small electronic accessories, I find these very awkward to get into with my arthritis and had to cut the edges of the case with scissors leaving me with excessive recyclable waste. My next gripe is that the wrist band came separate to the drive and had to be threaded through a small loop at one edge of the drive, I found this worse than threading a needle. The Go England 2gig VoyagerDrive is smaller than the standard DataWrite VoyagerDrive, the case is a transparent England Red with the same style brushed aluminium front & back, it comes in the same type of packaging and there is a soft plastic fob with the England Logo on one side with a mobile phone cleaner on the other. I had the same difficulty threading this into the attachment eye of the drive. The nylon cord is attached to the fob with a plastic spring which I found stretched excessively when I tried to extract the drive from the USB connector. The Go-England 2gig VoyagerDrive has a "Write Protect" slider on one side but there is no mention of this in the documentation and there is no indication on the switch as to determine the correct orientation. I found that by sliding the switch towards the USB connector write protection was enabled. The DataWrite VoyagerDrive illustrated above has no such switch 
Well that's my gripes about the cosmetic side of the drives, now let's see how they perform. | The VoyagerDrive comes preformatted with the FAT file system and the available space after formatting is as expected a little short of the capacity of the drive (the extra being taken up with the file system overheads). The drives were instantly recognised with the Window XP OS and the generic windows drivers were installed. I checked with device manager to make sure they had installed themselves on the USB2 High Speed Hub
I found that if I left the drive in the PC when I booted up it would revert to the USB1 Hub an the performance was degraded considerably.
I just removed the drive for a few seconds and on reinsertion it would connect to USB2 As you can see the drive is automatically identified in Windows XP as "CBM2080 Flash Disc USB Device" which has the Chipsbank chipset. Windows 98 need to have the drivers installed before connecting the drive, these drivers can be downloaded from HERE
To check the performance of the VoyagerDrive I transferred files of the full capacity of the drives to & from a fast hard drive. Transferring 1gig to the VoyagerDrive took under 5 minutes and 1gig from the VoyagerDrive took just over a minute. I reformatted the 1gig VoyagerDrive to FAT32 file system and tested again to find an increase in time to transfer to the drive of 1 minute but file transfer from the drive was the same. The 2gig drive took 5 mins 40 secs to fill & only 2 minutes to transfer to my hard drive. | | | | Hard Drive to VoyagerDrive | VoyagerDrive to Hard drive | | 1gig Voyager | Fat file system | 4mins 50secs | 65 seconds | | 1gig Voyager | Fat32 file system | 5mins 40secs | 65 seconds | | 2gig Voyager | Fat file system | 7mins 53secs | 2 minutes | | I used two programs called HD Tune and ATTO Disk Benchmark to check the transfer rate of the VoyagerDrives and compared the results with SD Memory cards in a fast Card Reader. The current consumption was measured with a digital ammeter connected in line with the VCC + supply line of the USB connector | Comparison of all 6 of the above Graphs (Click Graph for an in-depth Comparison)

As you can see from these charts the VoyagerDrives average a transfer rate of 14,000 kBytes/s compared with 8,000kBytes/s of the Turbo SD Card & over double the 6,520kBytes/s of the 500meg SD card. This speed is comparable with some not so old hard drives. I played back an mpg video I had transferred onto my drive and playback was faultless, I then Played part of a DVD Video Title Set I had on the VoyagerDrive and I was unable to distinguish it from the original movie. Apart from the cosmetics of the drives being oriented towards the younger generation they represent modern technology and are amazingly fast and efficient and I am sure I will make good use of them. Now if only I could remember where I put mine down
Added: Monday, June 05, 2006 Reviewer: Flashhits: 6940
No comments have been posted yet
|
 | |
|
Login |
|
|
|
|
 | |
 | |
|
Hot Tips |
|
|
| | | | HOT TIP STATISTICS | | | Total | Daily | | Tips: | 142 | | 1.20 | | Users: | 37 | | 0.31 | | Posts: | 155 | | 1.31 |
|
|
 | |
 | |
|
Latest Reviews |
|
|
|
|
 | |
|